Wow. Didn't even buy it and I'm still feeling pretty salty over that level of scam. Fuckyou Meg
Simp Chat Meg Turney - The Quest for Content: The Search for Butthole
- Thread starter Captain Marvel
- Start date
- Thread starter Captain Marvel
- Start date
- Reply 6768
I doubt any of us know her personally (I don't), but it could be that she's just a very awkward person, sexually especially and it's showing as a result of her inability to refer to her vagina as something other than Ms. Kitty. She likes showing off her body but it's entirely possible that she's not a sexual person at all.
I mean, I'd settle for lewd and crude at this point.
If she doesn't know how to be "sexy" and describe how she enjoys having sex or how certain acts arouse her.
She could just be blunt and tell us how she likes to have a cock stuffed in her pussy or (since she says she's bi) what exactly she likes about fucking women.
No "bajingo" talk, just use pussy or cunt....
But then she might have to acknowledge that she's a sex worker and not a model that does risque things.
If she doesn't know how to be "sexy" and describe how she enjoys having sex or how certain acts arouse her.
She could just be blunt and tell us how she likes to have a cock stuffed in her pussy or (since she says she's bi) what exactly she likes about fucking women.
No "bajingo" talk, just use pussy or cunt....
But then she might have to acknowledge that she's a sex worker and not a model that does risque things.
Don't get me wrong - I'm mostly "simpathetic" to your take and others' about being ripped off. All I'm trying to do is note that leaving her legitimately negative feedback in an effort to signal that you're not getting your money's worth may be an exercise in futility given how vocal she's been about "boundaries" in the past and she's got the ability to close up shop because she doesn't want to go full porn star in certain ways.
Yeah this set is the worst thing she's done. Full stop. Fucking hell Meg
I would leave negative feedback for no other reason than making sure the heros who leek her stuff don't get fucking ripped off.
🍬The most insane look between the 🍑 cheeks
Where? When? For Whom?
Where? When? For Whom?
We've had a lot of discourse over in the Amouranth discussion thread about the gaslighting that she does over being considered a sex worker ("I'm not a sex worker, I just cosplay as one") that I think Meg's deluding herself similarly. Meg probably doesn't want to publicly dignify that most of her fanbase via Onlyfans uses her content as jerk-off material and part of mentioning boundaries and restricting the type of content she makes is designed to support her argument as bullshit as it might be.
Dumb question since I don't subscribe to "creators" on Onlyfans or any of those sites, but are comments publicly visible to other subscribers?
Thats the thing. Meg, you’re a fucking sex worker. If she doesn’t know how to be sexual, then fucking showing off your naked body then you should be a little more in tune with what people like and what you like. Christ alive Meg, just get wet on camera or some shit
I just want to drop these two pics to show that the level of hole isn't actually new but the simulation of sex is. I don't think the latter was worth that price especially for 10 seconds of it but that was probably what she was charging for. The older one doesn't look like much but it's more obvious in motion as it slightly spreads apart.
I'd be interested in seeing that for sure, but she would need to lose more weight and be in better physical shape to ensure maximum financial benefits for making that sort of content. She'd be pigeonholed as a BBW or THICC-type if she started doing that kind of content tomorrow and I don't know how much appeal that holds over other more in-shape "creators" getting themselves off in PPVs.
Last edited:
Only thing that got pushed in that set was her Scamouranth-score.
No way she's getting good feedback from that video. Interesting to see how she reacts to it...
🍬 Same 20 Poses
🍬 Less than 5s of a POV angle which shows nothing
🍬 A look between the cheeks (Off Camera)
🍬 I didn't shave, so it's classed as a feature
🍬 The Same titty Bouncing I've been doing since the SourceFed Era
🍬 Miss Kitty, Miss Kitty, Miss Kitty!!
🍬 $75. Pay me.
Congratulations Meg. You've just beat Amouranth... and even she's using dildos & massagers at this point.
Okay SO many of you have been asking for more 🍑 content and for me to SPREAD MY CHEEKS
because hooooooly moly this BRINGS THE SPICE!
THIS IS THE POV ANGLE OF ALL POV ANGLES.
the view you have between the 🍑 cheeks is INSANE
🍬The most insane look between the 🍑 cheeks
.....---Sells set for 75 and doesn't show a single shot of her asshole in the video---.....
because hooooooly moly this BRINGS THE SPICE!
THIS IS THE POV ANGLE OF ALL POV ANGLES.
the view you have between the 🍑 cheeks is INSANE
🍬The most insane look between the 🍑 cheeks
.....---Sells set for 75 and doesn't show a single shot of her asshole in the video---.....
Last edited:
Tl;Dr she's officially a scammy cunt. I hope she magically gets aids for $75. It's a very spicy price point which will push boundaries and like and such as.
Looks like a few comments on her last post on the main page are calling her out. Bet they get deleted by morning. I tried to post a warning not to buy on her subreddit, but it's gone.
If this was a candid style video where she actually showed some asshole like Natalie Roush recently did it'd be really intriguing and an incentive to keep seeing what she'll do in the future. Didn't have to be a full spread but just a peek.
Bear in mind I've never cared about this like most people have but I do believe in doing what you're selling. A video that follows the same template she's done for a while now with such a small part of what you know people are paying a lot for isn't it.
There's no intrigue for what's next because there's no guarantee she does it again and if she does its going to be presumably at the same price. The idea to simulate doggystyle sex isn't a bad one but the cutoff view doesn't do it.
Bear in mind I've never cared about this like most people have but I do believe in doing what you're selling. A video that follows the same template she's done for a while now with such a small part of what you know people are paying a lot for isn't it.
There's no intrigue for what's next because there's no guarantee she does it again and if she does its going to be presumably at the same price. The idea to simulate doggystyle sex isn't a bad one but the cutoff view doesn't do it.